Here’s every A-list actor mentioned in the Epstein files

The fallout surrounding Jeffrey Epstein continues to shape public conversation, with the entertainment industry once again facing scrutiny following newly released materials from the U.S. Department of Justice. Officials say the archive includes millions of emails, photographs, and documents referencing well-known figures across multiple fields.

Authorities emphasized a key point: being named in the files does not indicate wrongdoing. In a February 14 update to Congress, the department described issuing a “final list” of 305 prominent figures whose names appear somewhere in the records.

The scope of the archive spans decades and industries, including politics, business, and entertainment. Among those referenced is late Hollywood icon Marilyn Monroe, whose inclusion illustrates that the documents contain broad historical references rather than direct allegations.

Several contemporary figures have drawn attention following the disclosures. Actor Kevin Spacey appears in the files, including a widely circulated 2002 photograph featuring Ghislaine Maxwell and former U.S. President Bill Clinton during a London visit.

Other entertainment figures referenced include filmmaker Brett Ratner and music icon Barbra Streisand. The archive also mentions director Woody Allen and his wife Soon-Yi Previn in connection with a reported 2010 dinner.

Additional names reportedly present at that gathering include Peggy Siegal, journalist Katie Couric, and television host George Stephanopoulos. Records also reference communications involving talent agent Casey Wasserman.

Maxwell was convicted in 2021 on charges tied to Epstein’s abuse network. Aside from Epstein and Maxwell, authorities say no individuals named in the released materials have been criminally charged in connection with his offenses.

For observers, the scale of the archive highlights how widely Epstein’s network intersected with powerful circles. Officials continue to stress the distinction between mention and misconduct, underscoring that inclusion reflects documentation — not proof of criminal activity — as public scrutiny continues.